A world decided by the wealthy

Can you imagine a world like this? What if in an election to select a student council president, instead of one vote per student, votes were weighted according to the amount of donations parents made? Or what if in national elections, there was a disparity in the value of one vote depending on the amount of tax paid?

This method of majority voting is called capital majority voting (or weighted voting), as opposed to a capita majority voting system where one person has one vote, and is actually widely adopted in the real world, from the IMF (International Monetary Fund) to shareholder meetings and general elections for idols.

While it may not be suitable for socially relevant themes such as the United Nations General Assembly or national elections, it is effective in areas where economic rationality is required. In order to ensure that decisions are carried out reliably and that the economic sphere continues to operate, superficial democracy and nice words are nothing more than pie in the sky.